Compare viable systems model vsm and soft systems model ss


Compare viable systems model vsm and soft systems model ss

Highest state death rate: The national average death rate for males in was Multiple amputations occurred at the rate of If we had deployed every cruiser and battleship we had we could have used them to dial in on the easternmost parts of the Ho Chi Minh trail and possibly interdicted these routes IF we had some kind of Morice Line type fencing and ground outposts to direct the fire to land within a matter of minutes instead of the aircraft interdiction problems.

We could have used naval guns to suppress enemy mm long-range artillery that out-ranged our guns in the firebase FOB wars.

Compare viable systems model vsm and soft systems model ss

We might have even been able to dominate the narrow strip of land where the two countries joined and clear the DMZ to turn it into a Morice type line that would have worked. The short range artillery firebase FOB to send out helicopters with foot sloggers CONOPS drew heavy casualties on our part and failed to be sustainable by the technology and resource poor South Vietnamese.

Its entirely possible that instead of Linebacker II B air raids and aircrew losses we could have bombarded North Vietnam to a truce without risking ANY pilots and not going broke with expensive aircraft and munitions.

We are still screwed up. Americans still don't get it. Naval gunboats are the way to do gunboat diplomacy. We have no gunboats today.

Missiles are too expensive and don't offer the demoralizing, we-can-bombard-them-forever aspect that naval guns provide. Nobody is scared of our cruise missiles quite frankly and war is a struggle to get the other side to quit.


At the operational and tactical levels, the less troops we have on the ground, the less troops we have to protect, feed and house. The less likely the civilians there will rebel against us. Having precision and MASSIVE, terrifying HE firepower at a second's call empowers our maneuver forces to defeat enemy forces in battle as well as hold key terrain like borders and sectarian partitions hint, hint.

I admit naval guns on deep hull ships would not help us deep inland in an Iraq, but they are needed if we are to secure the edges of an Iran and the Persian Gulf oil tanker routes. Mark Ash's shallow draft Monitors with guns and Ranger Larry's rocket ships could sail up the Iraqi rivers perhaps to do fire support.

We know from the Korean war, point targets like bridges can be smashed by naval guns yet the USN bureaucracy put a clamp on this real quick lest their carriers lose the ego limelight. We will go broke blowing up nothing using airplanes to bomb jungle.

Naval guns can inexpensively penetrate through the vegetation and hit real enemies IF we invest in some kind of agile air and ground observers to direct these fires. Naval gunfire is a national strategic, operational and tactical capability of the first order.

If we have to land troops, Iowas have the heavy gunfire to clear beach landing sites of potential foes. Helicopters are also extremely vulnerable like LCACs and need landing zone suppression gunfire from the Iowa's 16 inch and 5 inch guns in order to land safely and offload their troops.

Maximizing 16 Inch guns: The great penetration capability of these extremely high velocity rounds would be especially effective in attacking caves and deep installations.

The very high velocity also means they could eventually provide highly responsive tactical fire support out to miles, that could support future very deep Army Airborne and marine expeditionary force lodgments.

Unlike the scramjet missiles being developed for ship Vertical Launch System VLS launching from soft surface ships, the armored BBG's projectiles can be replenished at sea; moreover, the former's number of missiles deployed is limited by the number of available VLS cells.

The DDX will have 60 to 80 cells. The BBG could carry up to scramjet projectiles, if need be, as well as 96 VLS cells devoted to land attack missiles, but generally in normal practice would probably carry about inch scramjet to leave carry over room for other inch projectiles or the JSF VSM.

In addition, the scramjet projectiles, using a much simpler system, can most probably be fielded sooner in 5 to 8 years and at lower cost than can the more complex missiles with their separate engines. They would certainly be far cheaper than Tomahawk cruise missiles.

Development of scramjet projectiles could, however, substantially advance Navy development of scramjet missiles that could be used throughout the fleet in all ships with VLS cells. Our mile plus range and near Mach 6 speeds are, we believe, reasonable estimates of ultimate performance.

A single BBG would be capable of launching up to such long-range precision guided projectiles in one day. Reportedly, the air campaign launched against Iraq on March 21, "unleashed more than 2, missiles and bombs across Iraq in the first 72 hours.

Two BBGs could, in 48 hours, have fired 2, precision-guided scramjet projectiles that could have precisely reached any target in Iraq within seven minutes and with a variety of warheads, including deep penetrators. Making sure these are targets to be hit and providing honest feedback, the F JSFs could on the ground and in the air provide instant feedback to miscues and enemy evasive maneuvers for future strikes to be more accurate.

This does not mean BBGs could or should replace existing systems used in Iraq, but does demonstrate a great potential for a quantum increase in the Fleet's firepower that provides many options for executing complicated conflicts against determined and more capable nation-state foes who will not readily give us positional advantage to launch strikes with impunity unlike Iraq.

With its at-sea replenishment capabilities and with full replenishment every third day time depends on "hostile zone" location and available replenishment assetsone BBG could hypothetically fire such projectiles a day in a continuous firing attack for one week To equal this in rounds delivered would require 25 DDGs with 96 VLS cells each or a large part of the 37 ship DDG fleet - assuming a 5-day turnaround for the required in-port VLS missile replenishment.

This would require 3, Tomahawks, probably more than is now in the Navy's entire inventory. VLS-launched far more expensive Tomahawk missiles would have a significantly longer range and heavier payloads than scramjet projectiles, but would be much slower, much easier to defend against and would have less deep penetration capability.

They frankly, may simply not work against heavily concrete and steel fortified facilities.

Viable system model - Wikipedia The sum of horizontal variety disposed by n operational elements systems one equals the sum of the vertical variety disposed by the six vertical components of corporate cohesion. The variety disposed by System Three resulting from the operation of the First Axiom equals the variety disposed by System Four.
Systems approaches compared | CSL4D


Also they, unlike the BBG's projectiles, could not provide oft critically needed tactical fire support and fires against moving targets.May 05,  · The 5 approaches were (the links refer to earlier posts): SODA (Strategic Options Development and Analysis), VSM (Viable Systems Model), SSM (Soft Systems Methodology), SD (System Dynamics, worked case), and CSH (Critical System Heuristics).

I don’t think I need to waste too many words on it. Jul 15,  · System 1 has some special primacy in Beers VSM because it consists of other practicable systems and because it produces the viable system of which it is part.

The management meta-system, Systems, emerges from the need to facilitate the trading operations of system 1, and to ensure the fitted adaptation of the whole organization. Compare Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft Systems Model (SSM) in terms of their way of dealing with organisational issues.

Topics: Systems theory, Soft systems methodology, Systems . KEEP BATTLESHIP ADVANTAGE. Ship Provides Versatility, Unmatched Presence. By William Stearman. The U.S.

military is on the verge of losing some of its most effective weapon systems and political-military instruments: the Iowa-class battleships the Navy is now in the process of eliminating from the fleet.. Two ships, the USS Wisconsin and the Iowa, are in limbo and the other two the USS.

Compare Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft Systems Model (SSM) in terms of their way of dealing with organisational issues. We will write a custom essay sample on Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft Systems Model (SSM) specifically for you for only $ $/page.

Comparison between VSM and SSM. Viable system thinking is based on an optimising paradigm, whereas soft system thinking is based on a learning paradigm. Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft.

Systems approaches compared | CSL4D